I support this thought.

Ugh :/ I haven't seen these guys around, but hopefully they'll get bored and leave, or at least act maturely.

I was not able to catch all of their pictograms, but I got one to look out for click.

Edit; one of you repeated attacked Aniu with the devout pelt. How were they able to know about Aniu's weakness?

RikkaChan. Do you think that the demon can not find another demon?

Duke is not in the best shape right now. It's in his biography. And our group consists of several characters, if you hit a few of the demons, then attack the other. Such a way we are constantly in fighting condition. Some of us.

In any case, if someone does not want to interact with Duke - please write to my contacts, tell me, otherwise I can not know what you think.

Yet he continues to attack? It's no fun if other people their characters constantly have to be hurt because one group can't be hurt and attacks them multiple times every day.
Spell-spamming like you were doesn't come across as very IC either. Even if your characters "know" Aniu is a demon, why didn't they get hurt from the devout themselves? Could they just "sense" he gets hurt?

Tone it down, find your balance.

Pulchra, I was not involved in this fight, I think. And I can only answer for myself.

Mis, I do not know how to explain Aniu player, so I can not answer your question.
I have already explained why Duke behaves this way.

Logically speaking, if you continue harassing people, people will get annoyed and ignore you and no longer take your characters seriously. Simple as that.

Tone it down.

The forest isn't MEANT for constant fighting. The forest wasn't made for that. A fight here and there, sure. But all the time? No...I'm sorry. It doesn't work like that.

The line is where you're interfering with other peoples gameplay. THIS is the line.

So please, stop.

I appreciate the support, guys. I was scared to be alone in this, haha.

I think it'll just be better if your pack of demons leave us alone from now on, please.

RikkaChan, no problem with this.

hadoukin, it is not the purpose of the characters, but it turns out the vast majority. But I heard your opinion on this issue.

If your character is there literally just to cause fights then that will bother quite a few players if the characters are played near every day. There are predators that are specially designed purely for chasing others, however these characters aren't played often and that is when it IS fun.

Also, perhaps knowing when to stop attacking is something that players should understand. Don't make the attacks constant because that isn't fair. Give the characters a chance to shake their head 'no' or run away. The majority of characters are deer and have little defences against large carnivores. So please keep everything fair because It can get extremely annoying to have a character that cannot fight back and is constantly targeted.

And, please take damage, let the character limp around for a few days. Even if the character can heal quickly, it doesn't mean they are necessarily prepared for another fight like the flick of a light switch.

This isn't aimed at anyone in particular from that group. I have seen that group inforest and for the most part they keep to themselves. Anubis is the only character I have seen attacking a character relentlessly.

Most people have mentioned everything I would say already but I do have one point: You control your character so anything they do is first and foremost your choice, not 'their personality' or 'their history'. This goes for anyone who chooses to play aggressive or socially deplorable characters. It's fine to play them, but it needs to be done in a way that doesn't negatively impact other players enjoyment of the game. IC drama and fighting can be awesome when done between consenting players, maybe try restricting your characters negative actions towards characters who's players you know/have talked to in advance about having such interactions.

Over the months I've also managed to notice that certain individual whom I won't name from their group attacks fawns for no reason. It's been in others' updates a couple of times, I've wintessed it in the game as well and mainly also had my fawn attacked once.

I don't think that's right. Also yes, the good couple of last fights in the Forest I saw were with them included.

Oh well, the point is that you can have any characters you want as long as you do not ruin others' gameplay.

Terabetha, I manage my character, but in the game acting in his interest. How he thinks and what he wants, his and my opinion often do not agree, but this is the main idea of IC, or am I wrong? If he turns into a demon and had temporarily lost his mind, I can not ignore it as a player, but "restricting" try. In any case, if there are disgruntled as RikkaChan, then I stop the interaction between characters and the issue is closed, I hope.

It is true that being IC means separating what you feel from what your character feels, but it is still you who is in control so if people have a problem with how the character is acting, it is not purely an issue with the character behaviour it is partly an issue with your choices as well.

Stopping interactions between players who have asked (like RikkaChan) is a great way to help this issue but it won't prevent it happening again in the future. I feel that it might also help if you do not have your character attack strangers In Game without first checking to see if that player is open to interactions of that kind. For example, a lot of deer in game are not characters, or belong to players who do not want that sort of behaviour directed at them. It would help prevent other players becoming frustrated with your character if you were proactive, checking if interactions are OK before you do them, rather than waiting for negative feedback.

By making a list of characters who you know are fine with aggression, you can still play out fights and the 'demonic' side of your character without ruining the experience of players who would rather avoid fighting (including people who don't recognize your character).

Terabetha, I do not understand really. If the game is based on "close to reality", then the interaction between the characters is supported natively. Any character with any character. Or am I missing something? When I came on the biography of the characters, I did not see "the player does not want to play the attack." I saw something like "interaction is welcome"

I understand your opinion, but as previously mentioned, I can only answer for Mar-Duuk.
I take into consideration your opinion, thank you anyway for your words.

A main rule when playing aggressive characters

Ask first, fight later.

If you fight first and ask later, you aren't going to get a good reception.

"if you do not wish to be attacked/harrased/whatever, let me know", I'll write it directly to his biography, although I thought that if a person is unpleasant, he would write to me in any way and we will resolve this issue.

Terabetha, because I'm not a troll and not a demon. Duke and I - two different personalities. I do not want anyone to attack and annoying for no reason. Thank you also for your understanding and conversation, not condemnation.

"I don't think people should need to say 'I don't want my character attacked'"
, should not, but why not warn? As far as I know, in the forest a lot of characters that are the essence of a predator or something like that. It will be a good help in determining who support this kind of interaction, because in such a case of an attack the game will be with an element of surprise, more close to life.

"The Endless Forest as Tale of Tales designed it, is not a game that promotes or rewards aggressive behaviour. It is, at face value a peaceful game for people to relax."
But there are a lot of characters - predators, they do not even deer. In the biography can often find a warning about the content of "strong language, violence," and God knows what else. It is a little does not fit into "relaxation and peace," or am I wrong?

"For example I have seen many players in the past make a blog asking people to sign up if they have a character who would allow being hunted, attacked, whatever."
I think you gave me a good way to solve this problem.

Yes it is important people not label you a troll, it is obvious you are wanting everyone to enjoy the game.

There are a lot of predatory character but I would direct my previous comments towards anyone who plays a predator not just you (or any type of character prone to negative actions). My biggest issue with predators is that while playing the game, there is no direct way to know if one deer is a wolf, or a demon, or a dinosaur. Everyone appears as a deer (or small woodland creature). Even if you can get onto TEFc to check a biography, the site map is incorrect more often than not. Expecting people to see your deer in game and know that your character wants to eat them isn't a realistic expectation. It just isn't fair to expect everyone to memorize the ever growing list of negatively-behaving characters. It's much easier if the players of these negatively behaving characters are proactive and are the ones doing the avoiding.

"It is a little does not fit into "relaxation and peace," or am I wrong?" <- Your character certainly isn't the only one, there are many many characters (and players) who have deviated from what Tale of Tales intended this game to be. I've done it too! Some people resent the way the game has changed, but thats a huge argument that doesn't directly effect your character/this discussion.

No problem! I am glad that idea could work for you, I know it has helped in the past. It can be really fun because instead of just one In Game interaction, if you are already talking on a blog with other like-mined players, you can set up entire plots AND still be sure only people who are ok with negativity are involved.

hadoukin. Demons usually hunt. As well as killing in order to become stronger, to get the soul, it can be found in the biography of Raktera for example. Or update, which will be written after the interaction. As well no one is against the RP in which will be understandable why, what and how. In real time. Without an agreement with the suddenness, I understand that someone does not like it. They do not want to support it. And they are right on their part. But. Little suspense?
I am always open to someone wrote to me in a comment or Skype on any issue.