alcinda:
When I find how do "quote," I'll do it...

Anyway, alci; as happened me several times, I hit some similar behavior in life situations where take or done something and later required sssomething from the other. They're was in damn big troubles... And yes, it is only opinion and also experience, I guess.

I do not trust the things about which I am not fully convinced, and yes, for me is that a little less I think I will see. A model of Tin Deer? And so what? People can modeling for fun, but what about show an animation of grazing? If I will see a created animations, I will be more believing that something is happening behind scenes.

Now I didnt see that money will be actually used. Just the fact that they will "postpone" (or whatever they're call it...) made in me a feeling of insecurity if development even begins. Then they can say anything and puff, money flow far away. And plus they're actually behav and disabling comments... I really don't like such behav...

- - -

uit:
Yea, remember that there was an event where people show designs and some of them went to the game, it's true... It was really pretty to looking on others ideas. I think I was posting there too, but I'm not sure.

- - -

I also have to admit that grasslands or that weird creature I can't still remember that name..., I did not expect; new locations like the open plains, was one of my silent wish when I was here on Forest more active, after all, I still can imagine how this all will be looking (and exited from) but still, anyway, I do not trust much of their plan until it really starts. So, I will hold a certain skepticism, and I will not back away from that I feel pressure from their side.

I think one of my major problems on this whole thing is that we're not getting a decent response out of them both to address this whole situation and to clear things up.

It's either silence or just a petty "you're better than this!"

I think the whole idea of "sort it amongst yourselves" can only go too far before it's an giant mess like this, because a whole lot of us have different opinions.

What do you mean, 'so what?' By that logic, they could animate a grazing action 'for fun.' Not sure why one is more valuable than the other in terms of development.
They have to re-code the game from scratch and ect, so those kind of things won't come until later, anyway. Besides, we already have an animation that could possibly be used for grazing (the drinking action).



They haven't even received the funding yet, so it's no surprise they haven't started the game yet. They don't get the money until after the campaign. \:

If you're skeptical and distrustful of M&A, then by all means, don't donate. Many of us will be donating, though.

Edit: AND YEAH, what okaymeng said..

Chjooo... Vivala Czeglish...

Yes, I am, and I will be skeptical.
I'm not saying I will not donate later when all this starts to move, anyway, until I will have a certain distance from such things and promises. But it seems from you're something like "others will be" it's sounds, that who is not donating is less important or something like that, alci.


... just ignore that, I just training "quote"... : D xD

But yes.

My questions are
Can we have a proper detail explaination of why its better to break the remake into 3 parts instead of remaking the whole game one time. Isn't it a waste of time and euro? If it is not please explain how.

Why 46 thousand euros for fawn magic? Isn't it easy and cheap to add that when remaking the new codes?

A bump...

& Bumping..

Using the opportunity to ask a question:

Does moving to the new version imply losing one's set? (particularly concerned about those that can only be casted by Gods)

Urschanabi,


okaymeng,


Keepiru,
I suggest you email them.
What I got was a reminder about the campaign ending soon.

The quote answered your question for me. If it doesn't for you, that must be due to you, the player, having preference toward the game with sets.
The devs have a preference towards the phase development because that's the realistic way to start making a 40k multiplayer Unreal engine game with 27k money.
Gamedev takes planning to eliminate risks. That's why they build the essentials first, expand on them later when they have the resources. That's how this forest was made.

Hammering the full game together when you lack a third of the sum to cover the production, thus with no way to plan forward and no set timelines?
That's exactly how you blow your money.

As I'm not their official spokesman, I'm sure they'll reply to you regardless, btw.

I got the newsletter about the campaign, and also the unsubscribe notice (several hours later), Keep, so I'm inclined to think something bugged out on their side.

o yeeeeeeeeeeeeeee i did it!! sorryyyy

I have much lost because of the commission- couldn't give exactly 3000(

I can't hardly believe it. 77%!

Come on, guys. We can get another 3-4K before the campaign ends. <3 then we can have our sets and some actions.

Finally got round to donating x

.

parrots, it's the one in the about page as far as I remember. Thanks for donating more.

5 Hours left...

Nudges new game in only a bit more and we can have this new game sqeeeeeeeeeee!!!!!

So much time has passed, so much money spent. Sometimes I wonder what we could be doing different to make this process faster and easier. I think we've been doing well as a community to stay patient but I know personally I'm upset. Bumping this blog as a reminder of where it started.