September 10, 2011 - 5:25pm — BluedeerLegend18
... Pitbulls are treated.
They are some of the best dogs I know. They just have a bad reputation so dog owners treat them horribly, and it makes their reputation even worse. I hate how in some places you can't own pitbulls, how some insurances don't allow them, and how neighbors get mad when you own them and complain about their safety. And you can't really take them anywhere. I can't take them to go camping or to the beach or anything, because people fear them and hate them.
My friend has a purebred pitbull, and he is one of the friendliest dogs I know. I have never heard him growl, never seem him hostile towards anything, he wouldn't hurt a fly. And yet his owners say they can't take him anywhere because people hate him. Some people are afraid to go to their house. But I love to go to their house because their pitbull will always welcome me and let me pet him.
And I always hate how some people always see pitbulls as bad, evil creatures. I've read books and see movies where the pitbulls always kill everything and everyone on sight. Okay. No. Even the most aggressive pitbull... well, isn't that aggressive.
I know some pitbulls are aggressive and there have been cases of deaths from pitbulls... but pitbulls should never, ever be that deadly. They are that way because of their owners. They are abused because the owner hates them and their bad reputation. Well, if he hates the pitbulls so much, why did he buy him in the first place? Save the trouble and let a nice owner buy him. God.
No offense to any other users who loathe pitbulls. I just have an opinion and I think Pitbulls should not be treated like this. But if you fear pitbulls, you shouldn't, you should fear the people who abuse the pitbulls.
This is so unfair! You can't
Dragon Scroll.
Avvie by me, siggy by Saosin
I totally agree with this.
My brother had two pitbulls
It's not the breed or the animal itself it's the handler of the animal that is responsible for how the animal acts.
True.
Dragon Scroll.
Avvie by me, siggy by Saosin
Yes, but they were bred to
I thiiiiinnnkkk if two Pitbulls were raised together, they probably won't tear each-other up.
And yes, I hate how they are treated too. And how irresponsible the owners can be at times. :{
Yee, I might be wrong. :|
BluedeerLegend18 I definitely
I've got to disagree with you though, Lynetta. Only fighting dogs are bred to attack other dogs, not all pitbulls. As a matter of fact I foster a beautiful pit once [who was a total ham] and he HAD to stop to say hi to/play with every dog we met while we were on our walks. He was never aggressive to any other dog. He was even afraid of my cats! I also volunteer at an animal shelter and more than half of the dogs there are pits. The majority of them also get along with other dogs. I just don't want people to think pitbulls are dog aggressive because most of them are in fact not. They actually scored higher than poodles on a behavior test, and golden retrievers and german shepherds have a higher bite counts than pits!
Quote:Even the most
except the ones who, you know...kill people
Pitbulls used to be good dogs, back when they were bred carefully.
I won't get near them now that the breed has been ruined by careless people who only want a dog that looks and acts tough. I'm sure they were sweet once. And I'm sure there are some that act sweet.
Then there are ones that act sweet until they rip your face off.
Did you hear about that pregnant woman who was killed by her family pitbull?
and:
If a breed has been bred to be prone to violence, that breed will be prone to violence.
MS: Yes, I know they were
They're feared because now
Yes, it is the owner's fault---sometimes
they're also just terrible dogs 90% of the time.
And trust me, you don't hate people, you do not know what it is to hate people.
Wow, you could have pulled
"prone to violence?" "terrible dogs 90%" of the time? Where exactly are you getting your facts and/or statistics?
Mr.Sanguine: Honestly I think
Binta: Ignoring the statistic
Ignoring the statistic question. And your sarcasm.
Of course they're going to be prone to violence, it's how they were bred to be;
Much of a dog's temperament relates to it's breed history and genetic inheritance. I won't go too deep into the history of the Pit Bull as there are many good books and websites that cover the origin and history of the breed. It is common knowledge however, that the Pit Bull breed was developed for blood sports: Bull baiting, bear baiting, and later, dogfighting. When baiting bulls was deemed inhumane, ratting (a sport where a number of rats were placed in a pit for a specified time with the dog) and dog fighting became more popular
Foxell;
http://www.newson6.com/story/8746561/puppy-kills-baby-boy?redirected=true
That was quick.
--
My father loves pitbulls, my uncle owns two. I wasn't raised to hate them in any way. I've never had a personal bad experience with pitbulls. I'm just tired of people defending them constantly. They're a breed you have to be cautious with. I have no problem with people who can admit that and still like them.
I think both sides are sort
Pit bulls, no matter how much I absolutely adore the breed, were bred to be fighting dogs. It's in their nature, in their blood. It's... hard, to say the least, to breed something out of a species. It's kind of life... like, telling a tiger not to eat a certain type of meat. One tiger may learn it, but their offspring won't unless you carefully train them from birth.
What I'm saying is this: you may have a perfectly pleasant pitbull, but that dogs' whelps can and may be horrors. It's not ''blame the deed, not the breed'' anymore. It's blame both deed and breed. We bred pitbulls to be fighting dogs, and people are still doing it. We are the deed. People are also buying these dogs from breeders who are not careful, at all, thus bringing back aggression through breeding, even if they don't mean to do so. People should start buying shelter dogs, and breeding more.. gentle natured canines into pit bloodlines. Some, yes, can be wonderful dogs. I've had a few myself, and they were great. As long as I kept a firm hand on them. One minute of slack, and they could attack people and other dogs. People need to be careful with pits, very careful. Not just owners, either. Breeders, owners, pedestrians. Everyone needs to be aware of what these dogs are capable of. And I'm not saying everyone should shun or avoid pits. but work towards a common goal of neutralizing them.
Just my two cents, please don't jump me for it. I'm not here to fight.
^ That.
That.
Notice how they don't make
http://www.google.com/search?
wrong.
it was the top of the list.
Wrong.
Everyone in my family loves pits.
As said above. I have family members who own pits. I've spent plenty of time around them.
(:
try again.
I just find it a little silly
I wasn't going to comment on
First, I want to make one thing very clear: I like dogs of all kinds, I have no real bias towards any of them, and I can see this argument from both perspectives.
The common 'pitbull' that most people know today is not actually a breed. Most of the 'pitbulls' that you see on tv or on the street are actually mixed breeds between the American Pitbull Terrier (the original pitbull) and other bully breeds including boxers, Rottweilers, bulldogs, etc. The APBT was originally a cross between bulldogs and terriers bred to bait bears and bulls, and later put to use in ratting and dog fights. When these sports became unpopular, it became used in hunting, driving, protection, and numerous other uses including as a messenger dog during the World Wars. It has only been in recent years that the pitbull has become the 'monster' that a lot of people see it as, becoming popular with people who want a dog that appears intimidating.
The APBT as a breed is intended to be a friendly dog, loyal to it's family, and registered breeders work to retain a calm and pleasant temperament within the breed. With the rise of puppy mills and unregistered breeders, this careful planning has been allowed to slip, and when crossed with other bully breeds, the strong prey drive that normally lies dormant within the APBT can rise.
Yes, there are plenty of cases against pitbulls in recent years due to attacks, but when you look at the number of those attacks compared to the totality of dog attacks, it is not a large percentage. Through the years, there have been many 'phases' in which different dogs are subject to public anxiety. German shepherds after the second World War were thought to be aggressive and unpopular. Dobermans and Rottweilers followed, and in recent years the stigma is now against pitbulls. It really comes down to a combination of breeding and training with the individual dogs. When I worked at a vet clinic, we didn't take any more caution with pitbulls than we did with other dogs, and indeed, the breed we trusted least was actually the Chesapeake Bay Retriever. My mother, who bred dogs for years and showed them has been attacked three times in her career, once by a shepherd, and twice by dachshunds.
You have to be careful with any dog. They have minds that work very differently from our own, and if a dog isn't trained or given a proper schedule, they can become unpredictable. Many of the dogs that have been labeled as dangerous are ones where the owners have not bothered to give them proper training, and who don't bother giving them a proper schedule with feeding and walks to get rid of excess energy. An indifferent owner is almost worse than an abusive owner, because an indifferent owner doesn't care what his or her dog does, and doesn't see the warning signs coming, leading to an attack 'out of nowhere'. An abusive owner, while terrible, at least has some sense of what the dog is capable of.
I shouldn't have written so much, but I'll end with these words: With dogs, as with any thing, be careful of self-fulfilling prophecies. The more prejudice that is shown against anything, the more likely it is that that thing will eventually act as the prejudice expects.
believe what you want.
Thanks I will (:
Anyway, I've said what I wanted to, so I'm going to find something interesting to do~
Edit:
Oh, and by the by, I'm not prejudiced against pitbulls per-say, I couldn't care less if they kill people or how many people they kill, so long as it doesn't directly affect me. I simply dislike people who insist they're such a perfect breed (:
Well said trigger_mortis.
What you're ignoring is a
When pit bulls were still legally bred for dog fighting, any dog that showed any inclination towards human aggression was culled. The owners need to be able to enter the pit with the dogs, that can't happen if you have an animal willing to displace aggression onto a person in the middle of the fight. Obviously, this is not practiced today, but it address your theory that "animal aggression=human aggression".
Now, do I think they should be owned by everyone? Nope. I don't think the majority of the population deserves a pet, regardless of breed. However, since breeds such as the pit bull are constantly under threat of BSL and ignorance, it is the owners responsibility to be particularly careful in setting a good example with the breed. What I am tired of is the inflammatory, sensationalist remarks.
Saying you have to be cautious is a world of difference from "terrible creatures", me thinks.
Edit: Agree wholely with Trigger.
was unable to edit last
I also thought I should add, that I hope none of you are now seething in hatred for me though I would not be surprised
I enjoy little debates like this, I usually come out of them with more respect for the people involved.
Now I'm probably actually leaving.
Agreeing with both Mr.
@Mr.Sanguine: I in no way
Foxell: Good good~ Likewise,
Good good~ Likewise, no ill feelings (:
Same goes to you, Binta, I respect you deeply (:
In no way am I saying that
er blue deer, I think you
They said that an animal won't change its ways UNLESS you train them from birth.
like, even if you have a well behaved pit, that doesn't mean its puppies will be good.
^ /nodnod