I see a lot of bios where in their art tab, the links to images look like this -> x
Using the "x" is more than fine but if you've been wanting to know how to make those neat-looking image thumbnails that link to the full image (or somewhere else in general) then please check out the code bellow!
An example -> (click it and see what happens!)
the code that makes this possible ->
<**a href="LINK TO IMAGE LOCATION"**><**img src="DIRECT IMAGE LINK .png or .jpeg**" alt="HTML tutorial" width="104" height="95">
Just be sure to remove the **s (and yes, you can edit the width and height of the thumbnail!)
Just a friendly reminder: with a lot of pics it will take some time to load, not everyone have a fast connection. It's better to use the 'x' version in those cases (:
I guess my stance there is that even with slow internet, the option of using thumbnails would at least help prevent the irritation of accidentally clicking on the same "x" twice (The "x" is usually so darn tiny on bios I always end up viewing the same picture(s) multiple times XD).
At least with slow internet, having an empty or semi-empty box to click on would lead to that issue less often if that makes sense?
Also, I am sorry for the possibly unnecessary edit. I just didn't like the way I worded my original response to this comment very much lol
(click it and see what happens!)
THANK YOU. ♥ placing a
placing a boop here so I remember this.
Thank you so much for this.
Ooooooo! maybe I can actually
D'aww XD Anytime, guys. I am
Bless you.
Oh thank you i've been
Thank you.
Anytime! ^^ tell your
tell your friends! /shot XDI may add more little CSS codes in the near future
Just a friendly reminder:
Ahhh, that is
I guess my stance there is that even with slow internet, the option of using thumbnails would at least help prevent the irritation of accidentally clicking on the same "x" twice (The "x" is usually so darn tiny on bios I always end up viewing the same picture(s) multiple times XD).
At least with slow internet, having an empty or semi-empty box to click on would lead to that issue less often if that makes sense?
Also, I am sorry for the possibly unnecessary edit. I just didn't like the way I worded my original response to this comment very much lol
*Nudges this just in case